Role of Ethical AI in Re-Engaging Gen Z and Building Future Skills
Swati Minz, Pradeep Munda, and Aditya Gupta
Assistant Professor, Xavier Institute of Social Service, Email: [email protected]
Assistant professor, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, Email: [email protected]
Student, Symbiosis Centre for management and Human Resource Management, Pune, Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT:
The evolving application of artificial intelligence mechanisms in the global supply chains and export oriented service industries has radically transformed the job tasks, job constitution, and required domain knowledge for performance of the aforesaid job in question. This seems eminent in the view that employees need to engage more proactively in crafting their jobs in view of ethical AI intrusion in decision-making and manual task accomplishment space. As of now, we have limited knowledge about how the incumbent employees and why some sections of employees are more able to cognitively craft their jobs to accommodate ethical AI induced realities and adapt to changes being induced by ethical AI and whether it is feasible or not in the Indian perspective. Recent discourses on ethical and pro-decision-making integration of ethical AI in day-to-day decision making are scattered and limited. The purpose of this research is hence to organize and recognize the probable implications of ethical integration of Gen AI and integration awareness on incumbent employees’ re-indulgence in cognitive job crafting and self-employability revival by analysing issues in high technology software sectors as reported in Harvard and INSEAD studies. Drawing on the resource-based view and event systems theory, and integrating digital Taylorism into the ethical AI literature through the conservation of resources (COR) framework, this study theorizes the effects of ethical AI–related events. It examines how ethical AI–induced ethical job crafting influences employees’ psychological and cognitive sensemaking about transforming their self-employability, as well as the associated antecedents and outcomes. Using an empirical, multi-stage data research methodology, the study seeks to assess the data base causal relationships and reflect upon the role of ethical AI in job crafting in the evolving job market landscape. Likert scaling is being leveraged to quantify the phenomenon, and subsequently structural equation modelling was deployed to ascertain causal relationships. Research outcomes extend the resource-based view and event systems theory, digital taylorism, conservation of resources theory (COR), Bandura’s self-efficacy, Bakker’s JDR model; and owes implications for developmental HR policies. The research marks authentic contribution to ethical AI inclusion, work behaviour transformation and self-employability and vocational expertise formulation literature and about ways and means of leading ethically in digital age.
Keywords: Self Employability Behaviour, Ethical AI Integration Awareness, Cognitive Job Crafting Indulgence, Digital Taylorism, Second Half of Career, Gen Z Career Resilience.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70994/jjdms.11157.11171
FULL TEXT:
REFERENCES:
Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 411-423.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demands-resources theory: Implications for employee well being and performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay, Handbook of well being (pp. 2-6). Salt Lake City: DEF Publishers.
Barrick, M. R., Li, N., & Mount, M. K. (2012). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 2-9.
Bodea, C. N., Paparic, M., Mogos, R. I., & Dascalu, M. I. (2023). Artificial intelligence adoption in the workplace and its impact on the upskilling and reskilling strategies. Amfiteatru Economic, 26(65), 126-144.
Colaiacovo, I., Dalton, M., Kerr, S. P., & Kerr, W. R. (2022). The transformation of self employment. HBS Working Paper Series.
Demerouti, B. (2014). Job crafting: An introduction to contemporary work psychology. Work Psychology, 414-17.
Demerouti, E., Soyer, L. M., Vakola, M., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2020). The effects of a job crafting intervention on the success of an organizational change effort in a blue-collar work environment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(1), 374–399.
Dutton, J. E., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management, 26(2), 179-201.
Goethelf, J. (2020). How to reimagine second half of your career. Harvard Business Review, 2-8.
Goretzko, D., Siemund, K., & Sterner, P. (2024). Evaluating model fit of measurement models in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 84(1), 123–144.
Hirschi, A., & Pang, D. (2025). Exploring the “inner compass”: How career strivings relate to career self-management and career success. Applied Psychology, 75(1), 1-28.
Hornung, S. (2019). Crafting task and cognitive job boundaries to enhance self-determination, impact, meaning and competence at work. Behavioural Sciences, 3(12), 136.
Kelley, S. (2022). Employee perceptions of the effective adoption of AI principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(1), 871–893.
Lim, R. E. (2023). AI Is coming for all our jobs... or is it? INSEAD Knowledge.
Lin, Q., & He, l. (2024). Does artificial intelligence (AI) awareness affect employees in giving a voice to their organization? A cross-level model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 123(1), 103947.
Mukherjee, S., Rai, S., & Singh, K. (2025). Emotional exhaustion: The cost of seeking support for motivation among protean/boundaryless information technology professionals. Journal of Employment Counselling, 65(2), 103-115.
Oettal, C. B., Bergman, L. E., Bujacz, A., Leineweber, C., & Toivanen, S. (2025). Are you in or are you out? A longitudinal person-centered study of health and entrance and exit into self-employment. Business Research Quarterly, 28(3), 678–694.
Paraskevopoulou, L., Tzoumaka, E., Apospori, E., & Siachou, E. (2024). Active employees in the future workplace: From job crafting to selfergetic job crafting. European Management Review, 2(1), 1-21.
Sartori, R., Tommasi, F., Ceschi, A., Noventa, S., & Zene, M. (2023). Learning in the workplace:evidence on the role of behavioural job crafting on fostering self-perceived employability. European Journal of Training and Development, 47(10), 133-146.
Spulber. (2009). The theory of the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Srivastava, P. (2020). Mid life crisis and mid life career. Retrieved from https://www.praveencsrivastava.com/post/mid-life-crisis-mid-life-career.
Wang , Z., Liu, L., & Su, Y. ( 2025). When threats become catalysts: Cognitive job crafting, work meaningfulness, and employee proactivity in high-insecurity contexts. Organizational Psychology, 16(1), 2-9.
Wrzesniewski, A., LoBuglio, N., Dutton, J. E., & Berg, J. M. (2013). Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work. Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology, 1(2), 281–302.
Xavier, D. F., & Korunka, C. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence across cultural orientations: A longitudinal examination of creative self-efficacy and employee autonomy. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18(1), 100623.